RPG programmers are quite familiar with the CHAIN op code. COBOL programmers are equally as familiar with the random READ by key. However, many iSeries programmers are not so familiar with SQL's ability to join files. Recent conversations with other professional programmers have shown me that joins can be confusing. There are several types of joins, and sometimes programmers are not sure which type to use under what circumstances. My conviction is this: If you can understand RPG's CHAIN operation (or COBOL's READ by key), you can understand joins.
Join Types
SQL supports several types of joins, depending on the implementation. For the iSeries, joins can be divided into three broad categories.
- Inner joins produce results only when the values of the join fields of the primary file match the values of the join fields of at least one record in the secondary file.
- Outer joins return the records from the primary file, even if there are no matching records in the secondary file.
- Exception joins return the records from the primary file that do not have matching values in the secondary file.
Matches are usually based on equality (e.g., the customer number in an invoice file matches the customer number in the customer master file), but you may use any relational operator.
The Decision
When you program with record-oriented op codes, the question you must ask yourself is "What do I want to do if a CHAIN (random READ) fails?" You have two options: You can abort the processing of the primary record, or you can continue processing the primary file record but without valid data from the secondary file. For example, suppose you are reading a file of invoices. Each time you read an invoice record, you CHAIN to a customer master file to retrieve the customer's name and address. If the CHAIN fails, you may immediately skip to the next invoice or you may continue to process the invoice without valid customer data.
This is the same decision you must make when you join files. What do you want to do if no matching secondary file record is found? The answer to that question determines the type of join you must use.
If you want to abort processing of the current primary record, use an inner join. If you want to continue to process the current primary record without valid data from the secondary file, use a left outer join. If you want to process primary records only when the CHAIN fails, use an exception join.
I can illustrate the three joins with RPG programs and SQL commands that provide equivalent functions. First, however, here are the three tables (database files) that these examples use.
ID CUSTID
O1 C1
O2 C3
O3 C4
O4 C1
O5 C1
O6 C3
O7 C1
Customers
ID NAME
C1 CUST ONE
C2 CUST TWO
C3 CUST THREE
Omissions
ORDERID
O4
O6
In the following short RPG example, order records (from the primary file) print only if the customer number associated with an order matches a record in the customer master file (the secondary file).
FOrders IF E K Disk Prefix(O_)
F Rename(orders: OrderRec)
FCustomers IF E K Disk Prefix(C_)
F Rename(Customers: CustRec)
FMCPReport O E Printer Prefix(R_)
C Dow '1'
C Read OrderRec
C If %EOF()
C Leave
C EndIf
C O_CustID Chain CustRec
C If not %found()
C Iter
C EndIf
C Eval R_Order = O_ID
C Eval R_Cust = O_CustID
C Eval R_Name = C_Name
C Write Detail
C EndDo
C Eval *InLR = *on
Here's the equivalent SQL inner join.
from orders as o
inner join customers as c
on o.custid = c.id
And these are the results from the RPG program and the SQL query.
O1 C1 CUST ONE
O2 C3 CUST THREE
O4 C1 CUST ONE
O5 C1 CUST ONE
O6 C3 CUST THREE
O7 C1 CUST ONE
Notice that order O3 was not included in the output because customer C4 was not found in the customers file.
In the second example, each order prints whether the customer number is found in the customer master file or not.
FOrders IF E K Disk Prefix(O_)
F Rename(orders: OrderRec)
FCustomers IF E K Disk Prefix(C_)
F Rename(Customers: CustRec)
FMCPReport O E Printer Prefix(R_)
C Dow '1'
C Read OrderRec
C If %EOF()
C Leave
C EndIf
C O_CustID Chain CustRec
C If not %found()
C Eval C_Name = '**UNKNOWN**'
C EndIf
C Eval R_Order = O_ID
C Eval R_Cust = O_CustID
C Eval R_Name = C_Name
C Write Detail
C EndDo
C Eval *InLR = *on
Since all records from the primary file should print, use a left outer join in SQL.
ifnull(c.name, '**UNKNOWN**')
from orders as o
left outer join customers as c
on o.custid = c.id
Here are the results:
O1 C1 CUST ONE
O2 C3 CUST THREE
O3 C4 **UNKNOWN**
O4 C1 CUST ONE
O5 C1 CUST ONE
O6 C3 CUST THREE
O7 C1 CUST ONE
Order O3 was included. Since there was no valid data for customer C4 in the customers file, both the RPG program and the SQL query used the value **UNKNOWN** in place of a customer name.
In the final example, we include a file of omissions--orders that are not to be printed on the report. That is, an order is selected for print only if the CHAIN to the omissions file fails.
FOrders IF E K Disk Prefix(O_)
F Rename(orders: OrderRec)
FCustomers IF E K Disk Prefix(C_)
F Rename(Customers: CustRec)
FOmissions IF E K Disk Prefix(M_)
F Rename(Omissions: OmitRec)
FMCPReport O E Printer Prefix(R_)
C Dow '1'
C Read OrderRec
C If %eof()
C Leave
C EndIf
C O_ID Chain OmitRec
C If %found()
C Iter
C EndIf
C O_CustID Chain CustRec
C If not %found()
C Eval C_Name = '**UNKNOWN**'
C EndIf
C Eval R_Order = O_ID
C Eval R_Cust = O_CustID
C Eval R_Name = C_Name
C Write Detail
C EndDo
C Eval *InLR = *on
This calls for an exception join in SQL.
ifnull(c.name, '**UNKNOWN**')
from orders as o
exception join omissions as m
on o.id = m.orderid
left outer join customers as c
on o.custid = c.id
And these are the results of the program and the SQL query:
O1 C1 CUST ONE
O2 C3 CUST THREE
O3 C4 **UNKNOWN**
O5 C1 CUST ONE
O7 C1 CUST ONE
Notice that there are two different joins--an exception join and a left outer join--in this query. We only print orders that do not appear in the Omissions file, but once we have selected an order record, we print it even if the customer number is unmatched.
Rule of Thumb
When trying to decide which type of join to use, think about what you would do if you were using RPG or COBOL and a random read operation were to fail.
James Gates has spent most of the past 15 years working with AS/400 and iSeries systems.
LATEST COMMENTS
MC Press Online