04
Mon, Nov
5 New Articles

Royalty-Free Patents: GNU Says GNo!

Commentary
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times
The European Union (EU) has been considering loosening the requirements on software vendors so that software patents may be more easily obtained. But proposals for "royalty-free" software, created by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) are getting mixed reviews by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The FSF is the principal sponsor of the GNU Project and the GNU/Linux License, which licenses the Linux operating system throughout the world. At stake is the nature of the Internet community of developers who have fostered the rapid evolution and continued development of myriad software products.

Software Patents: The Genie out of the Bottle

Up until the 1980s, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) maintained that software could not be patented because it considered software to be extensions of mathematical algorithms. However, in a legal case called Diamond v. Diehr, the United States Supreme Court ordered the PTO to grant a patent on an invention even though computer software was utilized. In that case, the invention related to a method for determining how rubber should be heated in order to be best "cured." The invention utilized a computer to calculate and control the heating times for the rubber. However, the invention (as defined by the claims) included not only the computer program, but also steps relating to heating rubber and removing the rubber from the heat. The Supreme Court stated that in this case, the invention was not merely a mathematical algorithm, but a process for molding rubber, and hence was patentable. This was true even though the only "novel" feature of this invention was the timing process controlled by the computer.

Subsequently, throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the PTO struggled with developing guidelines for software patents until 1995 when it released its current guidelines.

However, in Europe the conditions under which a software patent may be granted have been traditionally more stringent. European patent law is currently defined by an agreement signed in 1973 called the European Patent Convention (EPC), and under this law only inventions may be patented. Exactly what an invention is has been a poorly defined concept, but the EPC specifically excluded mathematical methods, intellectual methods, ways of doing business, ways of presenting information and--specifically--computer programs. Nonetheless, after the 1981 United States Supreme Court ruling, the European Patent Office (EPO) began granting software patents, issuing more than 30,000 by 1986. However, compared to the U.S. PTO guidelines, the EPO guidelines are still more rigorous, because they limit the patents to software that is used in a business or industrial setting.

These days, the EU is trying to decide whether to consider loosening those restrictions to follow the US PTO lead. Of particular concern is a document proposed by the W3C that seeks to prevent undue litigation for companies that use software technologies across the Internet. This document is called the Royalty-Free Patent Policy.

The Germination of the Royalty-Free Patent Policy

Consider the case of XyQuest, back in the 1980s. XyQuest had developed a very popular and powerful word processing program called XyWrite that offered users unparalleled capabilities to edit and manipulate ASCII text files. Its primary competitors at that time were Microsoft Word and WordPerfect--each of which used their own proprietary file formats. XyWrite was so powerful that IBM approached XyQuest with a proposal to distribute XyWrite under the brand name of Signature. Signature was touted to become the IBM standard word-processing solution because it would work seamlessly with all of IBM's products and still meet all of IBM's requirements to be compatible with its own IBM Office word-processing offerings. However, there was a slight hitch in the negotiations.

When news of IBM's interest in XyQuest was announced, XyQuest was sued by a company called Productivity Software. Productivity Software had previously been granted a patent (U.S. Patent 4,777,596) for technology that minimized data entry keystrokes, a particularly important market niche in the 1980s. Unfortunately, the XyWrite word processor used a software technique that gave the user the ability to accept an abbreviation or correct a spelling error by simply hitting the space bar. This, Productivity Software claimed, was an infringement of its legally granted patent, and it wanted in on the IBM action.

XyQuest tried to license the technique from Productivity Software, but when negotiations failed--forcing XyQuest to remove the function from its product--IBM backed away from the Signature product. Signature never really made it into the marketplace, XyWrite continued to lose share in the marketplace to Microsoft and WordPerfect, and XyQuest finally succumbed when its investors sought more profitable climes. In the wake of this mini-disaster, software vendors suddenly took notice, and they started to be concerned about the impact that software patents might have on their own products.

Now fast-forward through the 1990s and the rise of the Internet to today, when patented, popular, and powerful software technologies such as XML and SOAP are in everyone's lexicon. Suddenly, software vendors are facing an incredibly difficult challenge: to build products that are derivatives of patented international standards. In this 21st century environment of interconnected products, it's clear that vendors can't be left exposed to potential claims of patent infringement without some legal framework for protection. Thus, in October of 1999, the W3C began work on something that it called the W3C Patent Policy Framework. This document, in various draft forms, continued to evolve into today's most important conceptual legal construct: the Royalty-Free Patent Policy.

What Is the Royalty-Free Patent Policy?

The Royalty-Free Patent Policy envisions a mechanism by which software developers who are members of the W3C can register the patents that have been granted to their intellectual property so that they can be freely used by other members of the W3C. In other words, by becoming a member of the W3C club, software vendors and developers will have access to a demilitarized zone where they will be substantially protected from lawsuits stemming from patent infringement. W3C members would not have to pay royalties or licensing fees if, by accident or design, their products used technologies "owned" by other members.

However, in order to make this DMZ work across international legal boundries, it's important that the patent laws of the EU more closely resemble the less-strict patent requirements of the United States. Thus, as the EU considers the W3C's proposed policy, there is substantial debate about whether the Royalty-Free Patent Policy is in the best interests of competition and innovation.

Free for Whom? GNU's Complaint

Across the spectrum of software developers, there is substantial disagreement about whether software patents are necessary or are--in practice--actual obstacles to competition and innovation. Numerous Web sites exist condemning the practice, the laws, the courts, the companies, and the governments that have "caved in" to the wranglings of intellectual property lawyers. These objecting entities often see the impact of software patents akin to the English Acts of Enclosure that once threw the English commoners off their homesteads between 1750 and 1810, paving the way for the Industrial Revolution. One might suppose then that the Free Software Foundation--the driving force behind the GNU/Linux License--would be equally opposed to software patents. After all, software patents seem to go against everything that the GNU Project represents.

However, the FSF has been extremely active in attempting to reconcile the interests of its members (which include some of the big names in software) with the spirit of its founding tenets. First of all, the FSF is involved because software patents are a reality and software licensing constructions like the GNU General Public License are something of an anomaly that need to be protected. But more importantly, the FSF seeks to maintain the community that fostered products such as Linux. Consequently, the FSF's chief complaints with the Royalty-Free Patent Policy are twofold and highly technical.

First of all, under the Royalty-Free Patent Policy, there are restrictions that would limit the size and scope of the public community that would have access to the patents. But secondly--and more critically from the FSF's point of view--the underlying provisions of the Royalty-Free Patent Policy prohibit the free distribution of products that contain the patented technologies. Such distribution is exactly what the GNU Project is about: free distribution of software! Software like the Linux operating system itself! And without such free distribution, the primary means of market distribution for GNU software is gone, prohibited, and subject to patent infringement claims.

For these reasons, GNU says "GNo!" to the final draft of the Royalty-Free Patent Policy. Such a policy--though protecting the rights of commercial software vendors--drives a stake into the heart of the open-source movement that has been driving the development of the Internet for the last five years.

IBM and Linux: Software Free for Royalty Alone

Of final note is IBM's perspective on the whole debate on software and technology patents. On the one hand, IBM is an important implementer of Linux and a significant contributor to the open-source movement of software. On the other, IBM has--for nine straight years--been the leading recipient of technology patents from the United States, with over 3,000 registered in 2001 alone. Is IBM supporting the W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy? You bet your life! Will it throw its weight behind the FSF's concerns? Probably not! Will this shift in the wind direction impact IBM's support of Linux and other GNU-sponsored software? Of course not! IBM will undoubtedly take advantage of any free technology that comes its way, modify it to meet its purposes, and then attempt to market it as its own solution. And who knows? Perhaps some new patents will be the result along the way.

On the other side, however, is the question of the FSF and the GNU Project itself. If the EU embraces the W3C proposal for royalty-free patents, we will perhaps be entering a new era in which patents will be free to royalty alone, enclosing the software marketplace and relegating the open-source movement to back alleys and flea markets. If, on the other hand, the EU determines that the current software patent mechanisms are sufficient, the legal wranglings between development companies will probably end up employing more lawyers than developers.

Where this is leading the EU and the software development community is now completely up in the air. If you have thoughts or comments, please pass them along in our forums. How the developer community responds to the current proposals will undoubtedly have an impact on the quality and the cost of software products our organizations use.

Thomas M. Stockwell is the Editor in Chief of MC Press, LLC. He has written extensively about program development, project management, IT management, and IT consulting and has been a frequent contributor to many midrange periodicals. He has authored numerous white papers for iSeries solutions providers. His most recent consulting assignments have been as a Senior Industry Analyst working with IBM on the iSeries, on the mid-market, and specifically on WebSphere brand positioning. He welcomes your comments about this or other articles and can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Thomas Stockwell

Thomas M. Stockwell is an independent IT analyst and writer. He is the former Editor in Chief of MC Press Online and Midrange Computing magazine and has over 20 years of experience as a programmer, systems engineer, IT director, industry analyst, author, speaker, consultant, and editor.  

 

Tom works from his home in the Napa Valley in California. He can be reached at ITincendiary.com.

 

 

BLOG COMMENTS POWERED BY DISQUS

LATEST COMMENTS

Support MC Press Online

$

Book Reviews

Resource Center

  • SB Profound WC 5536 Have you been wondering about Node.js? Our free Node.js Webinar Series takes you from total beginner to creating a fully-functional IBM i Node.js business application. You can find Part 1 here. In Part 2 of our free Node.js Webinar Series, Brian May teaches you the different tooling options available for writing code, debugging, and using Git for version control. Brian will briefly discuss the different tools available, and demonstrate his preferred setup for Node development on IBM i or any platform. Attend this webinar to learn:

  • SB Profound WP 5539More than ever, there is a demand for IT to deliver innovation. Your IBM i has been an essential part of your business operations for years. However, your organization may struggle to maintain the current system and implement new projects. The thousands of customers we've worked with and surveyed state that expectations regarding the digital footprint and vision of the company are not aligned with the current IT environment.

  • SB HelpSystems ROBOT Generic IBM announced the E1080 servers using the latest Power10 processor in September 2021. The most powerful processor from IBM to date, Power10 is designed to handle the demands of doing business in today’s high-tech atmosphere, including running cloud applications, supporting big data, and managing AI workloads. But what does Power10 mean for your data center? In this recorded webinar, IBMers Dan Sundt and Dylan Boday join IBM Power Champion Tom Huntington for a discussion on why Power10 technology is the right strategic investment if you run IBM i, AIX, or Linux. In this action-packed hour, Tom will share trends from the IBM i and AIX user communities while Dan and Dylan dive into the tech specs for key hardware, including:

  • Magic MarkTRY the one package that solves all your document design and printing challenges on all your platforms. Produce bar code labels, electronic forms, ad hoc reports, and RFID tags – without programming! MarkMagic is the only document design and print solution that combines report writing, WYSIWYG label and forms design, and conditional printing in one integrated product. Make sure your data survives when catastrophe hits. Request your trial now!  Request Now.

  • SB HelpSystems ROBOT GenericForms of ransomware has been around for over 30 years, and with more and more organizations suffering attacks each year, it continues to endure. What has made ransomware such a durable threat and what is the best way to combat it? In order to prevent ransomware, organizations must first understand how it works.

  • SB HelpSystems ROBOT GenericIT security is a top priority for businesses around the world, but most IBM i pros don’t know where to begin—and most cybersecurity experts don’t know IBM i. In this session, Robin Tatam explores the business impact of lax IBM i security, the top vulnerabilities putting IBM i at risk, and the steps you can take to protect your organization. If you’re looking to avoid unexpected downtime or corrupted data, you don’t want to miss this session.

  • SB HelpSystems ROBOT GenericCan you trust all of your users all of the time? A typical end user receives 16 malicious emails each month, but only 17 percent of these phishing campaigns are reported to IT. Once an attack is underway, most organizations won’t discover the breach until six months later. A staggering amount of damage can occur in that time. Despite these risks, 93 percent of organizations are leaving their IBM i systems vulnerable to cybercrime. In this on-demand webinar, IBM i security experts Robin Tatam and Sandi Moore will reveal:

  • FORTRA Disaster protection is vital to every business. Yet, it often consists of patched together procedures that are prone to error. From automatic backups to data encryption to media management, Robot automates the routine (yet often complex) tasks of iSeries backup and recovery, saving you time and money and making the process safer and more reliable. Automate your backups with the Robot Backup and Recovery Solution. Key features include:

  • FORTRAManaging messages on your IBM i can be more than a full-time job if you have to do it manually. Messages need a response and resources must be monitored—often over multiple systems and across platforms. How can you be sure you won’t miss important system events? Automate your message center with the Robot Message Management Solution. Key features include:

  • FORTRAThe thought of printing, distributing, and storing iSeries reports manually may reduce you to tears. Paper and labor costs associated with report generation can spiral out of control. Mountains of paper threaten to swamp your files. Robot automates report bursting, distribution, bundling, and archiving, and offers secure, selective online report viewing. Manage your reports with the Robot Report Management Solution. Key features include:

  • FORTRAFor over 30 years, Robot has been a leader in systems management for IBM i. With batch job creation and scheduling at its core, the Robot Job Scheduling Solution reduces the opportunity for human error and helps you maintain service levels, automating even the biggest, most complex runbooks. Manage your job schedule with the Robot Job Scheduling Solution. Key features include:

  • LANSA Business users want new applications now. Market and regulatory pressures require faster application updates and delivery into production. Your IBM i developers may be approaching retirement, and you see no sure way to fill their positions with experienced developers. In addition, you may be caught between maintaining your existing applications and the uncertainty of moving to something new.

  • LANSAWhen it comes to creating your business applications, there are hundreds of coding platforms and programming languages to choose from. These options range from very complex traditional programming languages to Low-Code platforms where sometimes no traditional coding experience is needed. Download our whitepaper, The Power of Writing Code in a Low-Code Solution, and:

  • LANSASupply Chain is becoming increasingly complex and unpredictable. From raw materials for manufacturing to food supply chains, the journey from source to production to delivery to consumers is marred with inefficiencies, manual processes, shortages, recalls, counterfeits, and scandals. In this webinar, we discuss how:

  • The MC Resource Centers bring you the widest selection of white papers, trial software, and on-demand webcasts for you to choose from. >> Review the list of White Papers, Trial Software or On-Demand Webcast at the MC Press Resource Center. >> Add the items to yru Cart and complet he checkout process and submit

  • Profound Logic Have you been wondering about Node.js? Our free Node.js Webinar Series takes you from total beginner to creating a fully-functional IBM i Node.js business application.

  • SB Profound WC 5536Join us for this hour-long webcast that will explore:

  • Fortra IT managers hoping to find new IBM i talent are discovering that the pool of experienced RPG programmers and operators or administrators with intimate knowledge of the operating system and the applications that run on it is small. This begs the question: How will you manage the platform that supports such a big part of your business? This guide offers strategies and software suggestions to help you plan IT staffing and resources and smooth the transition after your AS/400 talent retires. Read on to learn: